Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tristan Lamasine vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamasine vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Tristan Lamasine vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lamasine 0 - 1 Paul
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamasine has won 49.56% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 51.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamasine, in recent form, has won 50.76% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.33% and 36.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamasine has saved 55.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 59.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamasine has won 65.12% of matches played (W/L 56/ 30), with Paul winning 62.69% (W/L 42/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 175/ 157). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.62% of matches (W/L 31/ 21), where as Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.27% of matches (W/L 37/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamasine winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamasine winning 0 and Paul winning 2. The last match between Lamasine and Paul was at the Prague Challenger, 05-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamasine and Paul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamasine winning 0 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamasine winning 0, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamasine has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.87 while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 220.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamasine has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamasine has converted 44.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 50.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamasine 0 - 1 Paul
280
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
516
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
55% (422-343)
Career Total W/L
54% (175-147)
54% (21-18)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$160,780
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:36 | 1:41:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (42/75) | 59% (38/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 71% (27/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (14/33) | 50% (13/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (24/64) | 49% (37/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (21/18) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (45/43) | 56% (33/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (431/424) | 52% (288/268) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (17/9) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 112 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 118 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:16 | 1:40:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.67 | 246.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1674/2703) | 66% (1185/1800) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1150/1674) | 62% (740/1185) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (510/1029) | 50% (306/615) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (108/242) | 49% (94/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1082/2747) | 43% (783/1827) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (21/17) | 63% (5/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (20/38) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 16% (19/3) | 25% (12/3) |
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Tristan Lamasine
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Youssef Boubaker
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Jakub Paul
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamasine Vs Paul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
